ArticleInfection and drug resistance2025
Distribution and Antibiotic Resistance Analysis of 13,048 Clinically Common Isolates.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extensively Drug-Resistant (XDR) and Pandrug-Resistant (PDR)Microorganisms · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated the distribution and antibiotic resistance profiles of common bacteria isolated from clinical specimens at a hospital's microbiology laboratory between 2020 and 2022. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on microbial culture results from clinical specimens collected over three years, including sample types, departmental distribution, pathogen species, and resistance profiles. Results: A total of 13,048 unique pathogenic strains were isolated, predominantly from respiratory and urine specimens. Secretion specimens exhibited the highest positive detection rate (73.6%), while blood specimens showed a lower rate (9.7%). The five most frequently isolated pathogens were: Conclusion: The annual detection rate of CRE increased during the study period, while the rate of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.