Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027897›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

A comparative cross-sectional study of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on obstetrics and gynecology admissions in Croatia.

Karolina Kalanj, Mislav Mikuš, Mirta Peček, Ante Orbanić, Rick Marshall, Stjepan Orešković, Slavko Orešković

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karolina Kalanj *Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Mislav Mikuš *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia.
Mirta Peček *Institute for Emergency Medicine Virovitica- Podravina County, Virovitica, Croatia.
Ante Orbanić *Independent Consultant, Zagreb, Croatia.
Rick MarshallIndependent Consultant in Health System Funding Models, Eaglehawk Neck, TAS, Australia.
Stjepan OreškovićAndrija Štampar School of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Slavko OreškovićDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic placed unprecedented pressure on healthcare systems worldwide and altered patients' perceptions of the system's ability to protect them from virus transmission. One significant consequence was a marked decline in hospital activity, a trend observed globally. This study aims to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on hospitalization rates among patients with gynecological disorders in Croatia. It compares the number of patients treated surgically vs. conservatively before the pandemic (2017-2019) and during the pandemic (2020-2022) using the Diagnostic-Related Group (DRG) patient classification system. The DRG system is designed to group patients based on similar clinical conditions, complexity, and resource utilization. Hospital activity categorized by DRGs was analyzed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on case volumes within DRG groups associated with gynecological and obstetric disorders. Materials and methods: We conducted a comparative descriptive cross sectional study of the pre-post type according to STROBE guidelines to determine the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on hospital admission rates for patients with conditions associated with illnesses and abnormalities of the female reproductive system, as well as pregnancy, delivery, and the puerperium. The publicly available data collected by Croatian Institute of Public Health (CIPH) and the Croatian Health Insurance Fund (CHIF) were the main data source for this study. All gynecological hospital admissions in Croatia were grouped based on the Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (AR-DRGs) and analyzed over two time periods: before (2017-2019) and during the pandemic (2020-2022). Results: The average number of gynecological patients in all hospitals during the pandemic was 62,257 compared to pre-pandemic when the average number of patients was 71,519, a decrease of 15.5%. The results show a 10.56% decrease in the total number of non-surgical admissions and 12.8% decrease of surgical admissions across the hospital network during the pandemic (2020-2022). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant decline in inpatient treatments in gynecology and obstetrics departments in Croatia. Our findings highlight the need for obstetrics and gynecology practitioners to develop innovative strategies to maintain or enhance patient access to appropriate care while ensuring stringent infection prevention measures for both patients and healthcare personnel. Furthermore, investing in healthcare system resilience is crucial to maintaining core functions during future crises. The lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic provide a valuable opportunity to fortify healthcare systems and must not be ignored.

Indexed as

AR-DRGCOVID-19data transparencygynecologyhealth system responseinpatient careobstetricspandemic

Identifiers

PMID40027897
PMCPMC11867934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.