ReviewJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Bioprinting techniques for regeneration of oral and craniofacial tissues: Current advances and future prospects.
Review in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Biomaterials and 3D Bioprinting Approaches for Temporomandibular Joint Reconstruction: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Biofabrication for complex tissue regeneration: a scoping review of translational gaps in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- Functionalized GelMA-based hydrogels for osteoimmunomodulation and bone regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Clinical trial landscape for guided bone regeneration: trend analysis and future perspectives.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical translation of 3D bioprinting in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction: Recent progress and future directions.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Regenerative dentistry aims to reinstate, fix, renew, and regrow tissues within the oral and craniofacial domain. Existing regenerative methods are based on insights into tissue biology or disease processes that lead to tissue degradation. However, achieving complete and functional Tissue regeneration remains a primary challenge in real-world medical scenarios. Aim: The review focuses on the application of bioprinting techniques for rejuvenating intricate Oral and craniofacial tissues, such as craniofacial bone, periodontal ligament, cementum, dental pulp, temporomandibular joint cartilage, and whole teeth. Methods: Bioprinting, a cutting-edge technology in regenerative dentistry, strives to create entirely new Functional tissues and organs. This approach merges principles from engineering and biology to produce three-dimensional biologically operational constructs containing bioactive substances, Living cells and cell clusters using automated bioprinters. The review summarizes the outcomes achieved through bioprinting techniques in both in vitro (laboratory experiments) and in vivo (Studies on living organisms) experiments. Result: The emergence of this innovative tissue engineering technology has yielded highly promising outcomes during the experimental stages. Conclusion: These promising experimental results necessitate replication through human clinical trials to ascertain the viability of bioprinting techniques for mainstream clinical implementation in regenerative dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.