ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Finite element stress analysis to evaluate and compare the effect of splinting in periodontally compromised teeth having 55 % bone loss with different materials.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Splinting is commonly employed to stabilize periodontally compromised teeth, but the choice of splint material significantly influences stress distribution within the periodontal ligament (PDL) and surrounding bone. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the stress distribution of four different splint materials-composite, fiber-reinforced composite (FRC), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and metal-on mandibular anterior teeth with 55 % bone loss using finite element analysis (FEA). Methodology: Finite element models of mandibular anterior teeth with 55 % bone loss were developed using SOLIDWORKS 2020. Simulations were conducted for non-splinted teeth and for teeth splinted with composite, FRC, PEEK, and metal. Stress analysis was performed in ANSYS software under vertical (100N at 0°) and oblique (100N at 45°) loading conditions. Von Mises stress values in the PDL and cortical bone were recorded and statistically analyzed using MedCalc software to compare the performance of different splint materials. Results: Non-splinted teeth exhibited the highest stress levels, particularly under oblique loading conditions. Among the splinting materials, FRC showed the most effective reduction in stress across all teeth, especially under vertical loads. Composite and metal wire splints provided moderate stress reduction, with performance varying depending on the load angle. PEEK splints demonstrated good stress reduction under vertical loads but showed increased stress levels under oblique forces. These results underscore the influence of splint material and load direction on stress distribution in periodontally compromised teeth. Conclusion: The study highlights the critical role of splint material in reducing stress on the PDL of periodontally compromised teeth. FRC splints emerged as the most effective material for minimizing stress under both vertical and oblique loading conditions. Composite and metal wire splints offered moderate efficacy, while PEEK splints were less effective under oblique loads. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians in selecting optimal splint materials for periodontal stabilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.