ReviewOpen respiratory archives2024
[Sleep Innovation].
Review in Open respiratory archives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Hypoxemic Respiratory Diseases and Their Comorbidities: Molecular Insights and Diagnostic Advances in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Sleep Apnea.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence for predicting adherence to CPAP therapy in obstructive sleep apnoea: A systematic review.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in sleep medicine have driven significant improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This disorder affects one billion people worldwide and traditionally, diagnosis is based on polysomnography (PSG), a laborious method that requires specialized personnel. However, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in sleep medicine has made it possible to automate the analysis of sleep phases and respiratory events with high accuracy.Machine learning algorithms and neural networks have proven to be effective in automatic sleep coding, with hit rates comparable to those of human experts. These advances make it possible to improve the efficiency of sleep labs and to personalize OSA treatment. In addition, techniques such as cluster analysis are used to identify symptomatic patterns and phenotypes, which improves understanding of OSA pathophysiology and optimizes CPAP treatment.However, implementation of AI in hospitals faces technological, ethical, and legal barriers. Challenges include data quality, patient privacy, and the need for specialized personnel. Despite these obstacles, AI and Big Data have the potential to transform medical care for sleep disorders, improving both diagnosis and treatment adherence, provided regulatory and cultural barriers are overcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.