Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027838›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

AlphaFold as a Prior: Experimental Structure Determination Conditioned on a Pretrained Neural Network.

Alisia Fadini, Minhuan Li, Airlie J McCoy, Thomas C Terwilliger, Randy J Read, Doeke Hekstra, Mohammed AlQuraishi

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alisia FadiniCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge.ORCID 0000-0001-5246-9124
Minhuan LiJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering & Applied Sciences, Harvard University.ORCID 0000-0003-0560-7533
Airlie J McCoyCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge.ORCID 0009-0001-6855-9631
Thomas C TerwilligerNew Mexico Consortium.ORCID 0000-0001-6384-0320
Randy J ReadCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge.ORCID 0000-0001-8273-0047
Doeke HekstraJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering & Applied Sciences, Harvard University.ORCID 0000-0003-2332-9223
Mohammed AlQuraishiDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University.ORCID 0000-0001-6817-1322

Funding

PROJECT 5 - DUKE - STRUCTURE VALIDATION AND IMPROVEMENT FOR PROTEINS AND N. ACIDSP01GM063210 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI ADAMS, PAUL DAVID · 2001 to 2021
$33.5M
Identifying Principles of Protein Mechanics by Applying Force and Observing MotionDP2GM141000 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI HEKSTRA, DOEKE ROMKE · 2020 to 2020
$2.4M
Machine learning of biomolecular interactions and the human signaling networks they compriseR35GM150546 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Mohammed Nazar AlQuraishi · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM141000NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM063210NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM150546Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in machine learning have transformed structural biology, enabling swift and accurate prediction of protein structure from sequence. However, challenges persist in capturing sidechain packing, condition-dependent conformational dynamics, and biomolecular interactions, primarily due to scarcity of high-quality training data. Emerging techniques, including cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) and high-throughput crystallography, promise vast new sources of structural data, but translating experimental observations into mechanistically interpretable atomic models remains a key bottleneck. Here, we address these challenges by improving the efficiency of structural analysis through combining experimental measurements with a landmark protein structure prediction method - AlphaFold2. We present an augmentation of AlphaFold2, ROCKET, that refines its predictions using cryo-EM, cryo-ET, and X-ray crystallography data, and demonstrate that this approach captures biologically important structural variation that AlphaFold2 does not. By performing structure optimization in the space of coevolutionary embeddings, rather than Cartesian coordinates, ROCKET automates difficult modeling tasks, such as flips of functional loops and domain rearrangements, that are beyond the scope of current state-of-the-art methods and, in some instances, even manual human modeling. The ability to efficiently sample these barrier-crossing rearrangements unlocks a new horizon for scalable and automated model building. Crucially, ROCKET does not require retraining of AlphaFold2 and is readily adaptable to multimers, ligand-cofolding, and other data modalities. Conversely, our differentiable crystallographic and cryo-EM target functions are capable of augmenting other structure prediction methods. ROCKET thus provides an extensible framework for the integration of experimental observables with biomolecular machine learning.

Identifiers

PMID40027838
PMCPMC11870471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.