ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Differences in cell-associated and cell-free microbial DNA in blood.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the absence of infection, blood has previously been understood to be free of microbes. However, with advances in sequencing technology this notion has been challenged, prompting new investigations into microbial DNA within the blood of both healthy and diseased individuals. To comprehensively survey microbial DNA in blood, we separated blood into fractions (plasma, red blood cells, and buffy coat) and assessed if the microbial-DNA is cell-free by the addition of DNase to a subset of each fraction. We measured 16S rRNA gene copy number with digital droplet PCR and identified the taxonomic origin of the microbial DNA with synthetic full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing. As a use case, we examine microbial DNA from the blood of 5 men without prostate cancer (PC), 5 men with low-grade PC, and 5 men with high-grade PC. Our study demonstrates that the majority of microbial DNA is cell-free, indicating that it is not representative of proliferating microbes. Our analyses also revealed buffy coat had the lowest number of 16S rRNA gene copies yet highest number of genera of the fractions (median 23.3 copies/μL and 10 genera) and thus may be a useful fraction to study moving forward. Additionally, microbial DNA in blood may have utility as a biomarker, as we detected disease-associated compositional differences in the plasma and buffy coat fractions. This study lays the groundwork for rigorously studying microbial DNA in blood, however larger studies are needed to confirm our disease-association findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.