Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027709›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Relative timing and coupling of neural population bursts in large-scale recordings from multiple neuron populations.

Motolani Olarinre, Joshua H Siegle, Robert E Kass

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Motolani OlarinreMachine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.ORCID 0000-0002-0249-1099
Joshua H SiegleAllen Institute for Neural Dynamics, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-7736-4844
Robert E KassMachine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.ORCID 0000-0002-6680-4867

Funding

Diversity supplement to Analysis of Nonstationary Point Process DataR01MH064537 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KASS, ROBERT E · 2001 to 2024
$7.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The onset of a sensory stimulus elicits transient bursts of activity in neural populations, which are presumed to convey information about the stimulus to downstream populations. The time at which these synchronized bursts reach their peak is highly variable across stimulus presentations, but the relative timing of bursts across interconnected brain regions may be less variable, especially for regions that are strongly functionally coupled. We developed a simple analytical framework that obtains good estimates of population burst times on a trial-by-trial basis, and of the correlations in the timing of evoked population bursts across areas. We show that this method performs well on simulated data, and is 85 to 90% faster than an alternative, recently-published method while also being much easier to apply. Using this new approach, we examined the relative timing of the first two population bursts following the onset of a drifting grating stimulus in large-scale recordings of spiking activity from six cortical visual areas and one visual thalamic nucleus in thirteen mice. The new method allowed us to identify mouse-to-mouse variation in peak times and region-to-region functional coupling. While all results were consistent with known anatomy and physiology, we found some sequences of activity across areas to be the same across all mice, while others varied with the individual. The general approach can thus produce sensitive analyses of timing relationships across neural populations.

Indexed as

Cross-population interactionNeuropixelsspike train denoisingvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID40027709
PMCPMC11870560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.