Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027686›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Accurate

Paul R Munn, Jay Chia, Charles G Danko

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul R MunnBaker Institute for Animal Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14850.ORCID 0000-0001-9316-0879
Jay ChiaBaker Institute for Animal Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14850.
Charles G DankoBaker Institute for Animal Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14850.ORCID 0000-0002-1999-7125

Funding

Mapping RNA polymerase in tissue samples with ChRO-seq.R01HG009309 · NHGRI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI DANKO, CHARLES GRAHE · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional element annotations are critical tools used to provide insight into the molecular processes governing cell development, differentiation, and disease. Run-on and sequencing assays measure the production of nascent RNAs and can provide an effective data source for discovering functional elements. However, the accurate inference of functional elements from run-on sequencing data remains an open problem because the signal is noisy and challenging to model. Here we investigated computational approaches that convert run-on and sequencing data into annotations representing transcription units, including genes and non-coding RNAs. We developed a convolutional neural network, called convolutional discovery of gene anatomy using PRO-seq (CGAP), trained to identify different anatomical features of a transcription unit, which were then stitched together into transcript annotations using a hidden Markov model (HMM). Comparison with existing methods showed a significant performance improvement using our novel CGAP-HMM approach. We developed a voting system that ensembles the top three annotation strategies, resulting in large and significant improvements in transcription unit annotation accuracy over the best performing individual method. Finally, we also report a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) as a generative approach to transcription unit annotation that shows promise for further development. Collectively our work provides novel tools for

Indexed as

cGANCNNconditional generative adversarial networkconvolutional neural networkhidden Markov modelHMMtranscription unit annotation

Identifiers

PMID40027686
PMCPMC11870431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.