ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Accurate
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional element annotations are critical tools used to provide insight into the molecular processes governing cell development, differentiation, and disease. Run-on and sequencing assays measure the production of nascent RNAs and can provide an effective data source for discovering functional elements. However, the accurate inference of functional elements from run-on sequencing data remains an open problem because the signal is noisy and challenging to model. Here we investigated computational approaches that convert run-on and sequencing data into annotations representing transcription units, including genes and non-coding RNAs. We developed a convolutional neural network, called convolutional discovery of gene anatomy using PRO-seq (CGAP), trained to identify different anatomical features of a transcription unit, which were then stitched together into transcript annotations using a hidden Markov model (HMM). Comparison with existing methods showed a significant performance improvement using our novel CGAP-HMM approach. We developed a voting system that ensembles the top three annotation strategies, resulting in large and significant improvements in transcription unit annotation accuracy over the best performing individual method. Finally, we also report a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) as a generative approach to transcription unit annotation that shows promise for further development. Collectively our work provides novel tools for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.