ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Machine Learning-Enhanced Extraction of Protein Signatures of Renal Cell Carcinoma from Proteomics Data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we generated label-free data-independent acquisition (DIA)-based liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometry (MS) proteomics data from 261 renal cell carcinomas (RCC) and 195 normal adjacent tissues (NAT). The RCC tumors included 48 non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas (non-ccRCC) and 213 ccRCC. A total of 219,740 peptides and 11,943 protein groups were identified with 9,787 protein groups per sample on average. We adopted a comprehensive approach to select representative samples with different mutation sites, considering histopathological, immune, methylation, and non-negative matrix factorization (NMF)-based subtypes, along with clinical characteristics (gender, grade, and stage) to capture the complexity and diversity of ccRCC tumors. We used machine learning identified 55 protein signatures that distinguish RCC tumors from NATs. Furthermore, 39 protein signatures that differentiate different RCC tumor subtypes were also identified. Our findings offer an extensive perspective of the proteomic landscape in RCC, illuminating specific proteins that serve to distinguish RCC tumors from NATs and among various RCC tumor subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.