ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2025
A mechanistic modeling approach to assessing the sensitivity of outcomes of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to local contexts and intervention factors.
Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modeling the transmission dynamics of liver flukes (Science in One Health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diarrheal disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in young children. Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) improvements have historically been responsible for major public health gains, but many individual interventions have failed to consistently reduce diarrheal disease burden. Analytical tools that can estimate the potential impacts of individual WASH improvements in specific contexts would support program managers and policymakers to set targets that would yield health gains. We developed a disease transmission model to simulate an intervention trial with a single intervention. We accounted for contextual factors, including preexisting WASH conditions and baseline disease prevalence, as well as intervention WASH factors, including community coverage, compliance, efficacy, and the intervenable fraction of transmission. We illustrated the sensitivity of intervention effectiveness to the contextual and intervention factors in each of two plausible disease transmission scenarios with the same disease transmission potential and intervention effectiveness but differing baseline disease burden and contextual/intervention factors. Whether disease elimination could be achieved through a single factor depended on the values of the other factors, so that changes that could achieve disease elimination in one scenario could be ineffective in the other scenario. Community coverage interacted strongly with both the contextual and the intervention factors. For example, the positive impact of increasing intervention community coverage increased non-linearly with increasing intervention compliance. With lower baseline disease prevalence in Scenario 1 (among other differences), our models predicted substantial reductions could be achieved with relatively low coverage. In contrast, in Scenario 2, where baseline disease prevalence was higher, high coverage and compliance were necessary to achieve strong intervention effectiveness. When developing interventions, it is important to account for both contextual conditions and the intervention parameters. Our mechanistic modeling approach can provide guidance for developing locally specific policy recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.