ArticleDigital health
The application of artificial intelligence in stroke research: A bibliometric analysis.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently, artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely used for the prediction, diagnosis, evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke. However, the quantitative and qualitative description of this field is still lacking. Objective: This study aimed to summarize and elucidate the research status and changes in hotspots on the application of AI in stroke over the past 20 years through bibliometric analysis. Materials and Methods: Publications on the application of AI in stroke in the past two decades were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. Microsoft Excel was used to analyze the annual publication volume. The cooperation network map among countries/regions was generated on an online platform (https://bibliometric.com/). CiteSpace was used to visualize the co-occurrence of institutions and analyze the timeline view of references and burst keywords. The network visualization map of keywords co-occurrence was generated by VOSviewer. Results: A total of 4437 publications were included. The annual number of published documents shows an upwards trend. The USA published the most documents and has the top 3 most productive institutions. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation and Stroke are the journals with the most publications and citations, respectively. The keywords co-occurrence network classified the keywords into four themes, that is "rehabilitation," "machine learning," "recovery" and "upper limb function." The top 3 keywords with the strongest burst strength were "arm," "upper limb" and "therapy." The most recent keywords that burst after 2020 and last until 2023 included "scores," "machine learning," "natural language processing" and "atrial fibrillation." Conclusion: The USA shows a leading position in this field. At present and in the next few years, research in this field may focus on the prediction/rapid diagnosis of potential stroke patients by using machine learning, deep learning and natural language processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.