ArticleDigital health
Evaluating YouTube as a source of information on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- TikTok as a source of information for migraine: a content quality analysis.Oxford open digital health · 2026Article
- Article
- YouTube as an educational resource: Evaluating the quality and reliability of videos for family caregivers of persons living with Alzheimer's disease dementia.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare neurodegenerative disease that leads to progressive motor weakness and eventual death. Recent years have seen an increase in online information on ALS, with the popular video platform YouTube becoming a prominent source. We aimed to evaluate the quality, reliability, actionability, and understandability of ALS videos on YouTube. Methods: A search was performed using the keyword "Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis" on YouTube. A total of 240 videos were viewed and assessed by two independent raters. Video characteristics such as type of uploader, views, likes, comments, and Video Power Index were also collected. Results: Videos had moderate to low quality and reliability (Global Quality Scale [GQS] and modified DISCERN [mDISCERN] median 2.5), and poor understandability and actionability (PEMAT total median 8.5). Among the general video characteristics, only length of video showed a significant positive correlation across the tools (with mDISCERN [ Conclusion: YouTube videos are a poor source of information for ALS as videos tend to have moderate to low quality and reliability and are poorly understandable and actionable. Longer videos, and videos uploaded by those in the healthcare and educational fields, were found to perform relatively better. Thus, when using YouTube, caution and careful attention to the video characteristics are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.