ReviewWorld journal of hepatology2025
Strategies for discovering novel hepatocellular carcinoma biomarkers.
Review in World journal of hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noninvasive Multi-Omics Radiomic Model Integrating scRNA-seq and Bulk RNA-seq for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prognosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Advances and Future Perspectives.Vaccines · 2026Review
- MRI Radiomics for Distinguishing HBV-Related Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Precancerous Nodules.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: ctDNA as a Potential Biomarker for Diagnosis and Prognosis.Current oncology reports · 2025Review
- Up-regulated programmed cell death protein-1/its ligand 1 expression promotes metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease malignant progression.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver cancer, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), remains a significant global health challenge due to its high mortality rate and late-stage diagnosis. The discovery of reliable biomarkers is crucial for improving early detection and patient outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current and emerging biomarkers for HCC, including alpha-fetoprotein, des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin, glypican-3, Golgi protein 73, osteopontin, and microRNAs. Despite advancements, the diagnostic limitations of existing biomarkers underscore the urgent need for novel markers that can detect HCC in its early stages. The review emphasizes the importance of integrating multi-omics approaches, combining genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, to develop more robust biomarker panels. Such integrative methods have the potential to capture the complex molecular landscape of HCC, offering insights into disease mechanisms and identifying targets for personalized therapies. The significance of large-scale validation studies, collaboration between research institutions and clinical settings, and consideration of regulatory pathways for clinical implementation is also discussed. In conclusion, while substantial progress has been made in biomarker discovery, continued research and innovation are essential to address the remaining challenges. The successful translation of these discoveries into clinical practice will require rigorous validation, standardization of protocols, and cross-disciplinary collaboration. By advancing the development and application of novel biomarkers, we can improve the early detection and management of HCC, ultimately enhancing patient survival and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.