Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027506›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Cross-cultural adaptation and content validation of the Nurses' Professionalism Inventory to the Portuguese context: a methodological study.

Marlene Patrícia Ribeiro, Renata Cristina Gasparino, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes Ribeiro

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marlene Patrícia RibeiroICBAS, Abel Salazar Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Renata Cristina GasparinoSchool of Nursing, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes RibeiroNursing School of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nurses' professionalism is linked to the profession's principles and plays a crucial role in the quality and safety of care in the current context of complexity in healthcare systems. In the Portuguese context, no instrument allows evaluation of the nurses' professionalism, which led to the objective of cross-culturally adapting and validating the content of the Nurses' Professionalism Inventory for the Portuguese context. Methods: A methodological study was carried out and comprised six stages: translation, synthesis, back-translation, committee of experts, pre-test, and approval of the process by the original author developer of the instrument. Results: The first three stages were completed without difficulty. Nine experts were part of the committee to validate the instrument content. They evaluated items' semantic, idiomatic, cultural, and conceptual equivalences, clarity, and relevance. Modified Kappa and Content Validity Index were calculated for all assessments. Seven items were submitted in two rounds to achieve consensus in the assessments. The usability of the instrument was tested in the fifth stage. Forty nurses performed the pre-test and agreed that the instructions, items, and response options of the Portuguese version of the Nurses' Professionalism Inventory were easy to understand at 95.00, 97.50, and 92.50%, respectively. The author who developed the original instrument analyzed and approved the entire process carried out. Discussion: The cross-cultural adaptation of the Nurses' Professionalism Inventory to the Portuguese context was carried out according to international recommendations, and the conclusion of this study will provide an instrument to assess the nurses' professionalism in Portugal.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonNursesProfessionalismAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPortugalPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsnursesprofessionalismprofessional practicetranslatingvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID40027506
PMCPMC11868115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.