ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Prediction of respiratory diseases based on random forest model.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural determinants of pulmonary diffusing capacity identified by network analysis and machine learning on quantitative CT.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prediction of the respiratory disease incidence based on environmental factors using machine learning techniques in Penang, Malaysia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Investigating key genes and molecular mechanisms of prostate cancer and coronary heart disease through transcriptomics and experimental validation.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, the random forest model has been widely applied to analyze the relationships among air pollution, meteorological factors, and human health. To investigate the patterns and influencing factors of respiratory disease-related medical visits, this study utilized data on medical visits from urban areas of Tianjin, meteorological observations, and pollution data. First, the temporal variation characteristics of medical visits from 2013 to 2019 were analyzed. Subsequently, the random forest model was employed to identify the dominant influencing factors of respiratory disease-related medical visits and to construct a statistical forecasting model that relates these factors to the number of visits. Additionally, a predictive analysis of medical visits in Tianjin for the year 2019 was conducted. The results indicate the following: (1) From 2013 to 2019, the number of medical visits exhibited seasonal fluctuations, with a significant decline observed in 2017, which may be directly related to adjustments in hospital policies. (2) Among the meteorological factors, average temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, and ozone concentration significantly influenced the variation in medical visits, while wind speed, precipitation amount, and boundary layer height were of lesser importance. Furthermore, different linear relationships exist among the meteorological factors; specifically, meteorological factors show a negative correlation with pollutant elements, and there is a strong correlation among the pollutant factors. (3) When the number of medical visits ranged from 50 to 200, the predictions made by the random forest model closely matched the actual values, demonstrating strong predictive performance and the ability to effectively forecast daily variations in medical visits over extended periods, thus exhibiting good stability and generalization capability. (4) However, since the random forest model relies on a large amount of data for model validation, it has limitations in capturing extreme variations in medical visit numbers. Future research could address this issue by integrating different models to enhance predictive capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.