Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027476›Full record

ReviewAJOG global reports2025

Scoping review of climate drivers on maternal health: current evidence and clinical implications.

Claire Masters, Chuhan Wu, Dara Gleeson, Michaela Serafica, Jordan L Thomas, Jeannette R Ickovics

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJOG global reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claire MastersDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT (Masters).
Chuhan WuDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT (Wu).
Dara GleesonDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT (Gleeson, Ickovics).
Michaela SeraficaYale School of Nursing, West Campus, Orange CT (Serafica).
Jordan L ThomasDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA (Thomas).
Jeannette R IckovicsDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT (Gleeson, Ickovics).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the literature on associations between climate drivers and health outcomes among pregnant people. This review fills a gap by synthesizing evidence for a clinician audience. Data Sources: Systematic scoping review of articles published in PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov from January 2010 through December 2023. Study Eligibility Criteria: Empirical studies published in English-language peer-reviewed journals, assessing associations between select climate drivers and adverse maternal and birth outcomes. The review included studies examining heat, storms, sea level rise, flooding, drought, wildfires, and other climate-related factors. Health outcomes included preterm birth, low birthweight, small for gestational age, gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, miscarriage/stillbirth and maternal mortality. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods: The scoping review protocol was registered with the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY202410004, January 3, 2024) and conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Data were extracted by 2 authors; quality and risk of bias was assessed independently. Results: Total of 966 references were screened; 16.35% ( Conclusions: Climate drivers are consistently associated with adverse health outcomes for pregnant people. Continuing education for clinicians, and clinician-patient communications should be expanded to address risks of climate change and extreme weather exposure, especially risks of extreme heat in late-pregnancy. Results from this review should inform multilevel interventions to address adverse health effects of climate during pregnancy as well as practice advisories, protocols, checklists, and clinical guidelines in obstetrics.

Indexed as

climate changeenvironmental healthmaternal and child outcomespregnancyscoping review

Identifiers

PMID40027476
PMCPMC11869044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.