Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027464›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Evaluation of fluxon synapse device based on superconducting loops for energy efficient neuromorphic computing.

Ashwani Kumar, Uday S Goteti, Ertugrul Cubukcu, Robert C Dynes, Duygu Kuzum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashwani Kumar *Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Uday S Goteti *Department of Physics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Ertugrul CubukcuDepartment of Chemical and Nano Engineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Robert C DynesDepartment of Physics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Duygu KuzumDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With Moore's law nearing its end due to the physical scaling limitations of CMOS technology, alternative computing approaches have gained considerable attention as ways to improve computing performance. Here, we evaluate performance prospects of a new approach based on disordered superconducting loops with Josephson-junctions for energy efficient neuromorphic computing. Synaptic weights can be stored as internal trapped fluxon states of three superconducting loops connected with multiple Josephson-junctions (JJ) and modulated by input signals applied in the form of discrete fluxons (quantized flux) in a controlled manner. The stable trapped fluxon state directs the incoming flux through different pathways with the flow statistics representing different synaptic weights. We explore implementation of matrix-vector-multiplication (MVM) operations using arrays of these fluxon synapse devices. We investigate the energy efficiency of online-learning of MNIST dataset. Our results suggest that the fluxon synapse array can provide ~100× reduction in energy consumption compared to other state-of-the-art synaptic devices. This work presents a proof-of-concept that will pave the way for development of high-speed and highly energy efficient neuromorphic computing systems based on superconducting materials.

Indexed as

deep learningenergy efficient hardwareimage classificationJosephson junctionsneuromorphic computingsuperconducting loops

Identifiers

PMID40027464
PMCPMC11868091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.