Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027424›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Older Lineages of Oribatid Mites in Mountain Ranges Have Broader Geographic Ranges and Exhibit More Generalistic Traits.

Xue Pan, Bastian Heimburger, Ting-Wen Chen, Jing-Zhong Lu, Peter Hans Cordes, Zhijing Xie, Xin Sun, Dong Liu, Donghui Wu, Stefan Scheu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xue PanJ.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5984-7167
Bastian HeimburgerJ.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2302-019X
Ting-Wen ChenJ.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9449-3034
Jing-Zhong LuJ.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4051-8993
Peter Hans CordesJ.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5486-3931
Zhijing XieKey Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education Northeast Normal University Changchun China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2872-4767
Xin SunJ.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3988-7847
Dong LiuState Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Environment, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology Chinese Academy of Sciences Changchun China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5009-2466
Donghui WuKey Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education Northeast Normal University Changchun China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8778-0107
Stefan ScheuJ.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4350-9520
Ina SchaeferJ.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2841-4219
Mark MaraunJ.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2736-8548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding ecological and evolutionary mechanisms that drive biodiversity patterns is important for comprehending biodiversity. Despite being critically important to the functioning of ecosystems, the mechanisms driving belowground biodiversity are little understood. We investigated the radiation and trait diversity of soil oribatid mites from two mountain ranges, that is, the Alps in Austria and Changbai Mountain in China, at similar latitude in the temperate zone differing in formation processes (orogenesis) and exposed to different climates. We collected and sequenced soil oribatid mites from forests at 950-1700 m at each mountain and embedded them into the chronogram of species from temperate Eurasia. We investigated the phylogenetic age of oribatid mites and compared the node age of species with the mountain uplift time of the Alps and Changbai Mountain. We then inspected trophic variation, geographical range size, and reproductive mode, and identified traits that promote oribatid mite survival and evolution in montane forest ecosystems. We found that oribatid mites on Changbai Mountain are phylogenetically older than species in the Alps. All species on Changbai Mountain evolved long before the uplift of Changbai Mountain, but some species in the Alps evolved after the orogenesis of the Alps. On Changbai Mountain, more species possess broader trophic variation, have larger geographical range sizes, and more often reproduce via parthenogenesis compared to species from the Alps. Species on Changbai Mountain survived the mountain uplift or colonized the mountain thereafter, supporting the view that generalistic traits promote survival and evolution in phylogenetically old soil animal species. Collectively, our findings highlight that combining species traits and phylogeny allow deeper insight into the evolutionary forces shaping soil biodiversity in montane ecosystems.

Indexed as

biogeographygeographic range sizemountainsoribatid mitesreproductive modetrophic niche

Identifiers

PMID40027424
PMCPMC11871110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.