Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027318›Full record

ReviewThe journal of liquid biopsy2024

Clinical utility of liquid biopsy in bladder cancer: The beginning of a new era.

Eric Jia, Gautum Agarwal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric JiaDepartment of Computer Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Gautum AgarwalMercy Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder cancer (BC) is the sixth most prevalent cancer in the U.S. and the most expensive to treat. Integrating precision medicine into BC management promises improved outcomes and reduced costs. This review explores current treatment paradigms and the transformative potential of urine-based molecular diagnostics. Treatments for BC range from transurethral resection and intravesical therapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Recent breakthroughs include enfortumab vedotin with pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma, PD-1 immunotherapy for minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive patients and erdafitinib for NMIBC. Traditional diagnostic methods like cystoscopy, urine cytology, and imaging have limitations; urine-based diagnostics, particularly urinary tumor DNA (utDNA) analysis, offer a non-invasive, sensitive, and cost-effective alternative. These diagnostics facilitate personalized treatment, monitor therapy response, detect MRD, and enable earlier cancer detection. Incorporating urine-based diagnostics into clinical practice can reduce healthcare costs and improve patient quality of life. This review highlights the need for these diagnostics in routine BC management and emphasizes the impact of recent therapeutic advances.

Indexed as

Bladder cancerBladder cancer managementPrecision medicineQuality of lifeReviewUrine-based molecular diagnosticsUrine diagnosticsUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID40027318
PMCPMC11863694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.