ReviewThe journal of liquid biopsy2024
Clinical utility of liquid biopsy in bladder cancer: The beginning of a new era.
Review in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multi-modal approach for decision making in bladder cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Comparative genomic landscape of primary and metastatic bladder urothelial carcinoma in a large-scale cohort.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Cell-free RNA profiling uncovers non-canonical circulating D2 transcript elevation in Bladder Cancer plasma.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- Article
- Emerging technologies and clinical translation of urine-based liquid biopsy in urological cancers.Genes & genomics · 2025Review
- Liquid Biopsy: Current advancements in clinical practice for bladder cancer.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- The growing field of liquid biopsy and its Snowball effect on reshaping cancer management.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) is the sixth most prevalent cancer in the U.S. and the most expensive to treat. Integrating precision medicine into BC management promises improved outcomes and reduced costs. This review explores current treatment paradigms and the transformative potential of urine-based molecular diagnostics. Treatments for BC range from transurethral resection and intravesical therapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Recent breakthroughs include enfortumab vedotin with pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma, PD-1 immunotherapy for minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive patients and erdafitinib for NMIBC. Traditional diagnostic methods like cystoscopy, urine cytology, and imaging have limitations; urine-based diagnostics, particularly urinary tumor DNA (utDNA) analysis, offer a non-invasive, sensitive, and cost-effective alternative. These diagnostics facilitate personalized treatment, monitor therapy response, detect MRD, and enable earlier cancer detection. Incorporating urine-based diagnostics into clinical practice can reduce healthcare costs and improve patient quality of life. This review highlights the need for these diagnostics in routine BC management and emphasizes the impact of recent therapeutic advances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.