Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027317›Full record

ArticleThe journal of liquid biopsy2024

Expanding the clinical utility of liquid biopsy by using liquid transcriptome and artificial intelligence.

Maher Albitar, Ahmad Charifa, Sally Agersborg, Andrew Pecora, Andrew Ip, Andre Goy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maher AlbitarGenomic Testing Cooperative, Lake Forest, CA, USA.
Ahmad CharifaGenomic Testing Cooperative, Lake Forest, CA, USA.
Sally AgersborgGenomic Testing Cooperative, Lake Forest, CA, USA.
Andrew PecoraJohn Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Andrew IpJohn Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Andre GoyJohn Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the current utilization of liquid biopsy (LBx) is based on analyzing cell-free DNA(cfDNA). There is limited data on using cell-free RNA (cfRNA) levels (liquid transcriptome) in LBx. The major hurdles for using liquid transcriptome is its low level in circulation and the dilutional effects of various tissues that may pour their RNA into circulation. We explored the potential of using artificial intelligence (AI) to normalize the cancer-specific cfRNA and to enable liquid transcriptome to predict diagnosis. cfRNA transcriptomic data from 1009 peripheral blood samples was generated by hybrid capture next generation sequencing (NGS). Using two-thirds of samples for training and one third for testing, we demonstrate that AI is able to distinguish between normal control (N = 368) and patients with solid tumors (N = 404) with AUC = 0.820 (95 % CI: 0.760-0.879), patients with myeloid neoplasms (N = 99) with AUC = 0.858 (95 % CI: 0.793-0.924) and patients with lymphoid neoplasms (N = 128) with AUC = 0.788 (95 % CI: 0.687-0.888). Specific diagnosis was also possible when patients with lung, breast, colorectal, and myelodysplastic subgroups were tested. This data suggests that liquid transcriptomics when used with AI has the potential of transforming "liquid biopsy" to "true" biopsy, replacing the need for tissue biopsy.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence (AI)Cancer diagnosiscell-free DNA (cfDNA)cell-free RNA (cfRNA)Liquid biopsyNext generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40027317
PMCPMC11863701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.