ReviewThe journal of liquid biopsy2024
Liquid biopsy in gallbladder carcinoma: Current evidence and future prospective.
Review in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long Non-Coding RNA Expression in B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Analysis of LINC-PINT, MEG3, BALR6, and ZEB1-AS1.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Emergence of Liquid Biopsy in Precision Oncology: A Review of its diagnostic, Predictive and Therapeutic Applications in Gallbladder Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Review
- Point-of-Care Testing and Biomarkers in Biliary Diseases: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Diagnostic value of circulating lncRNAs HOTAIR, ANRIL, and MEG3 in oral squamous cell carcinoma and their correlation with clinicopathological features.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Article
- Circulating biomarkers in HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer: Clinical applications of liquid biopsy in diagnosis, prognosis, and surveillance.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- Early detection of gallbladder cancer: Current status and future perspectives.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although there have been significant advances in the early detection and treatment of gallbladder cancer (GBC), it is still considered a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Molecular profiling of tumors is generally performed using samples obtained during surgery or biopsy. However, tissue genotyping has its limitations as it only provides a single snapshot and is susceptible to spatial selection bias due to the tumor heterogeneity. Over the past decade, there has been a remarkable transition from invasive diagnostic methods to non-invasive alternatives, including liquid biopsy, for cancer diagnosis and monitoring. Liquid biopsies have ushered in a new era in clinical oncology, enabling convenient tumor sampling, continuous monitoring through repeated analysis, development of personalized treatment regimens, and assessment of therapy resistance. While peripheral blood is the primary medium for these biopsies, other biological fluids, including urine, saliva, and bile, also serve as valuable sources of information. Currently, the focus of blood-based biopsy analyses is on four main sources of biomarkers for cancer detection and stratification: circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or circulating free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and extracellular vesicle (EVs). There are over 300 clinical trials either ongoing or actively recruiting participants to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic applications of ctDNA/cfDNA in the context of cancer. This review outlines the current standard of care for individuals with GBC, anticipates future treatment developments, and evaluates the potential applications of liquid biopsies in various clinical contexts. The review addresses ctDNA/cfDNA, CTC, and circulating microRNA and highlights their prospective roles in management of GBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.