ArticleThe journal of liquid biopsy2024
Circulating tumor DNA kinetics: A future tool for radiation therapy personalization in lung cancer?
Article in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addition of pulsed electric field ablation to SBRT for lung tumors: effect on health-related quality of life.Lung cancer management · 2026Article
- Review
- [Research Progress and Challenges of Oligometastasis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a highly diverse disease in terms of its histology, staging and molecular biology, yet chemoradiation treatment paradigms are currently not individualized for these factors. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the plasma has clinical utility for several systemic therapies in advanced NSCLC, before, during and after treatment. However, in radiation oncology, the evidence for ctDNA in locally advanced NSCLC is largely limited to minimal residual disease (MRD) detection after treatment. In one study, all post-treatment MRD-positive patients developed disease relapse, compared with just 7% of ctDNA MRD-negative patients. As chemoradiation causes a bolus of tumor cell death with each treatment fraction, it has been posited that ctDNA levels fluctuate as well on a per-fraction basis. Indeed, four preliminary studies reveal a subgroup of patients with a transient elevation of ctDNA levels after the first radiotherapy fraction, followed by an overall ctDNA drop. To follow-up on these data suggesting an early ctDNA spike during chemoradiation, there is a need for larger and more systematic inter-fraction ctDNA studies, which if successful, could form the basis for more personalized and efficacious radiotherapy treatment paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.