Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027302›Full record

ReviewThe journal of liquid biopsy2024

Targeted liquid biopsy for brain tumors.

Muhammad Izhar, Ziyad Ahmad, Manahil Moazzam, Arwa Jader

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. A Dual-Channel Synergistic Ultrasensitive Biosensor for Tumor Liquid Biopsy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Immunoregulatory extracellular vesicles in multiple myeloma patients' peripheral blood.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Malignant Meningiomas: From Diagnostics to Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad IzharDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Ziyad AhmadDepartment of Orthopedics, Medical Teaching Institute, Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan, Pakistan.
Manahil MoazzamKhyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Arwa JaderDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kufa University, Kufa, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a promising source of molecular biomarkers in the detection and monitoring of brain malignancies. Unlike peripheral blood, where biomarker detection is hindered by the blood-brain barrier and the complex nature of biofluids, CSF offers a more direct and enriched source of tumor-derived markers, including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), microRNA (miRNA), proteins, and extracellular vesicles (EVs). These biomarkers, originating from brain tumor cells, are often more concentrated in CSF than in peripheral blood due to the proximity of CSF to the central nervous system (CNS). The presence of ctDNA in CSF is notably higher than in plasma, making CSF an advantageous medium for liquid biopsy in brain tumor patients. Traditional liquid biopsy approaches relying on peripheral venous blood samples often face challenges in detecting low concentrations of tumor-derived biomarkers. The direct contact of CSF with the CNS minimizes background noise, potentially enhancing the accuracy and sensitivity of diagnostic assays. Despite the barriers posed by the blood-brain barrier and other physiological factors that limit biomarker levels in the systemic circulation, CSF's unique position within the CNS allows for more effective biomarker collection. While peripheral blood remains the standard medium for liquid biopsy in oncology, the proximity of CSF to brain tumors suggests it may offer superior diagnostic capabilities. Emerging evidence from non-CNS malignancies indicates that collecting biofluids closer to the tumor site can significantly improve biomarker detection. Although this approach has been well-documented in other solid tumors, its application to CNS malignancies remains underexplored. This study hypothesizes that targeted blood sampling from CNS tumor-draining veins could similarly enhance biomarker detection, thereby increasing the sensitivity and efficacy of liquid biopsy techniques in diagnosing and monitoring brain malignancies.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBrain tumorsCerebrospinal fluidGliomaTargeted liquid biopsyTumor-proximal veins

Identifiers

PMID40027302
PMCPMC11863980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.