ArticleBrain & spine2025
Navigated percutaneous placement of cervical pedicle screws: An anatomical feasibility study.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of a novel spine stabilization technique on intervertebral movement in cervical spine surgery using a humanoid surgical robotic system.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive cervical spine stabilization: A multicenter study of completely percutaneous pedicle screw-rod instrumentation.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive pedicle screw placement with image-guided navigation in cervical spine injuries.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Comparison of open and percutaneous navigated pedicle screw placement for traumatic injuries of the subaxial cervical spine.Brain & spine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Percutaneous cervical pedicle screw placement is challenging due to complex anatomy, and requires navigation support. It is unclear how to ensure navigation accuracy in minimally invasive procedures. Research question: How accurate is image-guided percutaneous pedicle screw positioning after referencing with only one clamp for the complete subaxial cervical spine? Materials and methods: In six cadavers, all subaxial cervical pedicles were fitted with screws using a standardized procedure. Briefly, a reference clamp was placed via a small skin incision on spinous process C7. The procedure started from C3 and progressed towards C7, without additional imaging, using one registration for all vertebrae. Screws were placed using a navigated screwdriver. Cone-beam CT was performed at three time-points. Screw position was directly intraoperatively evaluated by the surgeons using a modified classification-from Grade 1 (perfect placement) to Grade 5 (highly inaccurate)-and these data were re-evaluated by two independent radiologists. Results: In six human specimens, 10 guidewires each were placed bilaterally in C3-C7. One screw (1.7%) was intraoperatively classified as Grade 3, but as Grade 4 in the second assessment. All other screws were classified as Grades 1-2 (89.8%) or 3 (8.5%). Screw placement accuracy was not significantly impacted by distance to the clamp or side selection. Discussion: In percutaneously navigated screw placement with intraoperative imaging, safe screw placement was possible with a reference clamp on C7. Clinical application of this technique has been limited to individual cases. We also propose a new classification for improving screw accuracy and clinical consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.