Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027284›Full record

ReviewThe journal of liquid biopsy2023

Liquid biopsy: Cell-free DNA based analysis in breast cancer.

Konstantinos Venetis, Giulia Cursano, Carlo Pescia, Marianna D'Ercole, Francesca Maria Porta, Marta Cruz Blanco, Chiara Frascarelli, Mariia Ivanova, Elena Guerini Rocco, Nicola Fusco

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Platelet Indices as a Biomarker in Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Harmonization trial onThe journal of liquid biopsy · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Liquid Biopsy in Solid Tumours: An Overview.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Liquid Biopsy in the Clinical Management of Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Konstantinos VenetisDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy.
Giulia CursanoDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy.
Carlo PesciaDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy.
Marianna D'ErcoleDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy.
Francesca Maria PortaDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy.
Marta Cruz BlancoDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy.
Chiara FrascarelliDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy.
Mariia IvanovaDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy.
Elena Guerini RoccoDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy.
Nicola FuscoDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer management has witnessed significant advancements, especially in the diagnosis and treatment response monitoring through the implementation of imaging techniques and tissue biopsy procedures. Nevertheless, there is potential for further improvement by integrating less invasive approaches that offer timely and precise information. Liquid biopsy, which involves isolating tumor-derived components such as circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and its subset known as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), can greatly enhance the prognosis, identification of specific genomic alterations, and selection of targeted therapies for breast cancer patients. While the incorporation of ctDNA-based testing into clinical practice has been primarily focused on metastatic breast cancer (MBC), there is growing interest in its applicability in early-stage breast cancer given the ability to capture tumor heterogeneity. Additionally, the minimally invasive nature of ctDNA testing allows for multiple serial samplings, providing a dynamic assessment of tumor characteristics and monitoring treatment response over time. However, the analysis of ctDNA in breast cancer encounters a significant challenge related to its abundance and the temporal aspect of the disease. The quantity of ctDNA in relation to the disease stage poses an important obstacle that often hinders its accurate analysis. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure timely sample collection, employ sensitive detection methods, and carefully manage the pre-analytical phase to overcome these challenges and facilitate successful ctDNA analysis in breast cancer. This article aims to summarize the methodologies employed in the detection of ctDNA, provide a comprehensive review of the current applications of ctDNA analysis in breast cancer, and elucidate the underlying rationale for its potential extension into broader clinical contexts. Furthermore, models that could facilitate the widespread adoption of ctDNA testing in various healthcare institutions are discussed.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBreast cancercfDNActDNALiquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID40027284
PMCPMC11863823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.