Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027283›Full record

ReviewThe journal of liquid biopsy2023

Circulating tumor DNA in clinical trials for solid tumors: Challenges and current applications.

Claudia Parisi, Marco Tagliamento, Laila Belcaid, Mihaela Aldea, Arnaud Bayle, Jordi Remon-Masip, Antoine Italiano, David Planchard, Benjamin Besse, Fabrice Barlesi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Liquid Biopsy in Solid Tumours: An Overview.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Claudia ParisiDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Marco TagliamentoDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Laila BelcaidDepartment of Oncology, Copenaghen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Mihaela AldeaDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Arnaud BayleDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Jordi Remon-MasipDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Antoine ItalianoDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
David PlanchardDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Benjamin BesseDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Fabrice BarlesiDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor derived biomarkers including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and/or circulating tumors cells (CTCs) may be detected and quantified through liquid biopsy (LB). ctDNA analysis through LB is a validated tool for monitoring response to systemic treatment and detecting molecular mechanisms of resistance at the time of progression of advanced stage malignancies. Several applications of ctDNA have been investigated in the diagnostic phase of cancer or in the post-curative treatment surveillance phase (e.g., minimal residual disease assessment after neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy). Recently, the improvement of ctDNA technology and its implementation have affected early phase trials design, with significant changes in the inclusion and randomization phases. Implementation of LB has resulted in large-scale development of academic programs aimed at exploiting all the potential applications of ctDNA, such as patients extended molecular screening, molecular oriented treatment decision making, monitoring of anti-cancer treatments response. In this rapid evolving field, the challenge is no longer the technique, but the evaluation of the results and the interpretation of their impact on diagnosis, prognosis, or therapeutic decision. Leading research cancer centers may favor education for scientific community, by capturing data on this evolving technology and sharing knowledge. In this review we summarize the main applications and challenges of ctDNA genotyping in clinical trials, with special focus on ongoing studies. We finally describe the most important next generation academic and industry-sponsored programs addressing early cancer detection and prevention in high-risk populations through ctDNA genotyping.

Indexed as

CancerClinical trialsctDNAEarly detectionLiquid biopsyMinimal residual diseaseMolecular genotypingMolecular resistance

Identifiers

PMID40027283
PMCPMC11863815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.