Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027280›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025

Structures and strategies for retaining an international pediatric cohort from birth: Lessons from The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study.

Patricia Gesualdo, Jessica Melin, Rachel Karban, Claire Crouch, Michael Killian, Diane Hopkins, Annika Adamsson, Joanna Stock, Suzanne Bennett Johnson, Judith Baxter and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00279318 (Consortium for Identification of Environmental Triggers of Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00279318 completednot on this map

Consortium for Identification of Environmental Triggers of Type 1 Diabetes

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Ran2004 to 2025Enrolled8,667ConditionsType 1 Diabetes Mellitus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Patricia GesualdoBarbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jessica MelinDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Sweden.
Rachel KarbanBarbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Claire CrouchPacific Northwest Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Michael KillianPacific Northwest Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Diane HopkinsCenter for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Annika AdamssonInstitute of Biomedicine, Research Centre for Integrative Physiology and Pharmacology, and Centre for Population Health Research, University of Turku, And Department of Pediatrics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Joanna StockInstitute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, And Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, And Forschergruppe Diabetes e.V., Neuherberg, Germany.
Suzanne Bennett JohnsonDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Judith BaxterBarbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
TEDDY Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Retention of study participants in observational studies is essential to maintaining the representativeness of the population, minimizing selection bias, and assuring sufficient statistical power. The aim of this report is to describe the structures and strategies used to retain participants in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) Study, an observational study of children at increased genetic risk for type 1 diabetes followed in an intensive protocol from birth until age 15. Methods: Teague et al.'s systematic review of study retention strategies identified four domains: barrier reduction; community building; follow-up/reminder; and tracing strategies (1). TEDDY retention strategies were categorized into each of these domains. A fifth category presented strategies unique to TEDDY. Results: TEDDY employed over one hundred retention strategies during the 15 years of follow-up; many could be categorized within the Teague domains. Strategies unique to TEDDY included (1) study structures to support retention; (2) risk communication and education strategies specific to this population; (3) Data-informed retention strategies that addressed protocol challenges in real-time; and (4) implementation of a re-engagement protocol for those who had withdrawn from the study. Conclusion: Pediatric cohort studies should include strategies, structures, and resources to address retention at the study's initiation and on an ongoing basis. Retention strategies should not remain static but change with the developmental needs of the child. Collecting and analyzing data on an ongoing basis permits retention strategies to be put in place to address protocol and retention challenges in real time. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00279318.

Indexed as

Longitudinal studyPediatricRetentionStrategiesType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID40027280
PMCPMC11869834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.