ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025
Structures and strategies for retaining an international pediatric cohort from birth: Lessons from The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00279318 (Consortium for Identification of Environmental Triggers of Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Consortium for Identification of Environmental Triggers of Type 1 Diabetes
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Risk of Disease Progression of Type 1 Diabetes in First-Degree Relatives of People With Type 1 Diabetes: Design and Rationale of a Prospective, Longitudinal Study in China.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Unfolding the Mystery of Autoimmunity: The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) Study.Diabetes care · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Retention of study participants in observational studies is essential to maintaining the representativeness of the population, minimizing selection bias, and assuring sufficient statistical power. The aim of this report is to describe the structures and strategies used to retain participants in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) Study, an observational study of children at increased genetic risk for type 1 diabetes followed in an intensive protocol from birth until age 15. Methods: Teague et al.'s systematic review of study retention strategies identified four domains: barrier reduction; community building; follow-up/reminder; and tracing strategies (1). TEDDY retention strategies were categorized into each of these domains. A fifth category presented strategies unique to TEDDY. Results: TEDDY employed over one hundred retention strategies during the 15 years of follow-up; many could be categorized within the Teague domains. Strategies unique to TEDDY included (1) study structures to support retention; (2) risk communication and education strategies specific to this population; (3) Data-informed retention strategies that addressed protocol challenges in real-time; and (4) implementation of a re-engagement protocol for those who had withdrawn from the study. Conclusion: Pediatric cohort studies should include strategies, structures, and resources to address retention at the study's initiation and on an ongoing basis. Retention strategies should not remain static but change with the developmental needs of the child. Collecting and analyzing data on an ongoing basis permits retention strategies to be put in place to address protocol and retention challenges in real time. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00279318.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.