ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025
Effects and safety of acupuncture versus non-penetrating sham acupuncture for senile pruritus: Rationale and design for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06506240 (Effects of Acupuncture for Senile Pruritus), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Acupuncture for Senile Pruritus: Study Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Senile pruritus (SP), characterized by idiopathic itch in individuals aged 60 years and older without primary skin lesions, significantly impacts sleep and quality of life. Effective alternative treatments are needed. Acupuncture has been suggested as a potential intervention to alleviate pruritus; however, its role in managing SP remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for SP. Methods: This single-center, parallel, two-arm, randomized, sham-controlled trial will enroll 200 patients diagnosed with SP in a 1:1 ratio to either the acupuncture or sham acupuncture group, receiving acupuncture or sham acupuncture three sessions weekly for six weeks. Participants, outcome assessors, and the statisticians will be blinded. The primary outcome is the change from baseline in the Average Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (AP-NRS) score at week 6. Secondary outcomes include changes in AP-NRS (at other timepoints), Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS), number of scratch episodes, itchy area of body surface, overall dry skin score (ODS), the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Long-term effects of acupuncture will also be explored. Adverse events and additional treatments will be monitored throughout the study period. The modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population which includes participants who complete baseline assessments and receive at least one treatment session will be analyzed. Discussion: This trial represents the first rigorously designed, single-center, randomized, sham-controlled study assessing the effects and safety of acupuncture for senile pruritus. We used valid outcome measurements which can provide valuable insights into the patient's symptoms and facilitate tracking symptoms over time and evaluate treatment effectiveness. This study may provide valuable insights into the research topic and inform future research. Ethics and dissemination: This study has received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (2024-087-KY). Trial registration: Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06506240) on July 11, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.