ReviewThe journal of liquid biopsy2025
Liquid biopsy in gastric cancer: A snapshot of the current state of the art.
Review in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular classification and precision therapy in gastric cancer: Current advances and future perspectives (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsies for the diagnosis of early-stage gastric cancer: A 5-year systematic review.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Review
- Precision oncology in gastric cancer: navigating molecular subtypes, therapeutic targets, and future horizons.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges Related to HER2 Heterogeneity in Gastric Cancer: Bridging Molecular Pathology and Clinical Decision-Making.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Spatial immune ecology of immunotherapy resistance in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Bibliometric analysis of global research on liquid biopsy for gastric cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Raman spectroscopy and machine learning for early detection of gastric cancer and Helicobacter pylori with gastric juice.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is nowadays considered a robust source to search for druggable tumoral genetic alterations, and in some specific settings liquid biopsy (LB) is already part of the diagnostics scenario and it has successfully implemented in the everyday practice. Three strengths make LB an extraordinary tool: i) to represent the complex molecular mosaicism that characterizes spatially heterogeneous malignancies; ii) to monitor in real-time the tumoral molecular landscape (i.e. to depict the longitudinal/temporal tumor evolution); iii) to ensure molecular profiling even in those cases in which tissue sampling is not feasible or not adequate. This review provides a snapshot of the current state of the art concerning ctDNA assay utility in gastric cancer (GC), testing its robustness as marker and seeking to understand the reasons for the delay in its application in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.