ReviewArchives of academic emergency medicine2025
Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Predicting the Neurological Outcomes of Cardiac Arrest Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Cooperation of Neurogranin with Calmodulin Promotes the Treatment of Aging-Related Diseases via Regular Exercise.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Previous studies have investigated different methods for estimating neurological outcomes after cardiac arrest. However, there is still much uncertainty about using optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement as an indirect method for predicting neurological outcomes following cardiac arrest. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the value of ONSD for predicting the neurological outcomes of cardiac arrest survivors. Methods: We comprehensively performed a systematic search in three main electronic databases, including Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science Cochrane, from inception to August 2024. Based on the heterogeneity evaluation results, fixed or random effects models were used to estimate the pooled diagnostic parameters. Meta-regressions were performed for subgroup analysis. Results: The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ONSD for predicting the neurological outcomes were 0.56 (95% CI, 0.35-0.74) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96), respectively. Meta-regression revealed that as the cutoff level of ONSD increases, the sensitivity significantly decreases (P < 0.01), while the specificity significantly increases (P = 0.01). Furthermore, meta-regression analysis revealed that ONSD measurement using CT scans is significantly associated with lower sensitivity and higher specificity compared to ultrasound (P = 0.009 and P = 0.01). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis showed that ONSD has low sensitivity and high specificity for predicting neurological outcomes in survivors of cardiac arrest. However, since the cut-off values and methods of ONSD measurement affect its predictive performance, further studies will be required to standardize these factors to achieve optimal predictive parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.