Liquid biopsy into the clinics: Current evidence and future perspectives.

As precision oncology has become a major part of the treatment landscape in oncology, liquid biopsies have developed as a particularly powerful tool as it surmounts several limitations of traditional tissue biopsies. These biopsies involve most commonly the isolation of circulating extracellular nucleic acids, including cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), as well as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), typically from blood. The clinical applications of liquid biopsies are diverse, encompassing the initial diagnosis and cancer detection, the application as a tool for prognostication in early and advanced tumor settings, the identification of potentially actionable alterations, the monitoring of response and resistance under systemic therapy and the detection of resistance mechanisms, the differentiation of distinct immune checkpoint blockade response patterns through serial samples, the prediction of immune checkpoint blockade responses based on initial liquid biopsy characteristics and the assessment of tumor heterogeneity. Moreover, molecular relapse monitoring in early-stage cancers and the personalization of adjuvant or additive therapy via MRD have become a major field of research in recent years. Compared to tissue biopsies, liquid biopsies are less invasive and can be collected serially, offering real-time molecular insights. Furthermore, liquid biopsies may allow for a more holistic evaluation of a patient's disease, as they assess material from all tumor sites and can theoretically reflect tumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, quicker turnaround-time also constitutes an advantage of liquid biopsies. Disadvantages or hurdles include the challenge of detecting low amounts of tumor deposits in peripheral blood or other fluids and the potential of different amounts tumor-shedding from different metastatic sites, as well as potentially false-positive from clonal hematopoietic mutations of indeterminate potential (CHIP) mutations. The clinical utility of liquid biopsies still must be validated in most settings and further research has to be done. Clinal trials including alternate bodily fluids and leveraging AI-technology are expected to revolutionize the field of liquid biopsies.