ReviewThe journal of liquid biopsy2024
Liquid biopsy for monitoring minimal residual disease in localized and locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer after radical-intent treatment.
Review in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical significance of serum levels of 14-3-3β protein in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Circulating miR-184 and miR-206 as predictive biomarkers for early recurrence in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Advancing Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Management Through Multi-Omics Integration: Insights from Genomics, Metabolomics, and Radiomics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Adjuvant chemotherapy for gallbladder cancer: Current evidence, controversies, and future directions.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- The growing field of liquid biopsy and its Snowball effect on reshaping cancer management.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood-based biomarkers investigation does not require invasive tissue biopsies and may explore diverse tumoral components such as proteins, microRNAs, circulating tumor cells, ctDNA, and exosomes and may better reflect tumor molecular heterogeneity, either temporal or spatial. ctDNA is related to tumor burden and represents a more objective measure of the total body disease burden than imaging findings. ctDNA profiling can be therefore useful to determine minimal residual disease (MRD), which is defined as the remaining tumor cells or tumor-derived material after definitive treatment in patients with no clinical evidence of disease. The detection of MRD is highly predictive of future disease recurrence. Although detectable MRD is associated with a poor prognosis, it is not clear whether MRD detection can guide therapy escalation to improve patient outcomes. In this review, we present four cases of epidermal growth factor receptor (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.