ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Predictive model for postoperative pneumonia in patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative Fibrinogen-to-Prealbumin Ratio and in-Hospital Postoperative Pneumonia After Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Infection Phenotype Profiling.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Predictive Value of Perioperative Systemic Inflammation Response Index Dynamics for Postoperative Pulmonary Infection Following Esophagectomy: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- A nomogram predicting the risk of postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy in esophageal carcinoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Preoperative prognostic nutritional index as a predictive factor for postoperative pneumonia in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pneumonia is one of the most common complications after esophagectomy and a risk factor affecting postoperative survival of esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and construct a predictive model for postoperative pneumonia (POP) in esophageal cancer. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included esophageal cancer patients who underwent therapeutic esophagectomy from June 2019 to December 2023. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to screen predictive factors for POP, and a nomogram was constructed based on the selected predictive factors after screening. The performance of the model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: A total of 667 esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy were included, of whom 61 (9.1%) developed postoperative pneumonia. After LASSO regression analysis, factors independently associated with POP included mechanical ventilation for more than 2 days (P=0.000) and blood transfusion (P=0.003). A nomogram was constructed based on these independent risk factors. The AUC of the predictive model for POP was 0.839 (95%CI: 0.768-0.911). The internal verification result showed a good discriminative power and the DCA results demonstrated a good predictive value. Conclusion: The predictive model constructed in this study can predict the risk of POP in patients with esophageal cancer, and may promote early intervention for high-risk patients by clinicians to reduce the incidence of POP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.