ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
The impact of multiple myeloma drugs treatments on autologous stem cell transplantation in the era of new drugs.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Adherence to Immunomodulators in Multiple Myeloma: Retrospective Observations from a Safety-Net Hospital.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Correlation Between SGK1 Expression Level and Multiple Myeloma Progression After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- RNA-Based Therapeutic Strategies in Multiple Myeloma: From Molecular Targets to Delivery and Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients who are eligible for transplantation. This procedure follows response achieved through induction therapy. The key to the success of ASCT lies in the quantity and quality of hematopoietic stem cells collected after mobilization. Studies have shown a positive correlation between the number of hematopoietic stem cells collected and the engraftment time of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and platelet count (PLT). However, the advent of novel therapeutic agents that have significantly improved the survival of MM patients has also impacted hematopoietic stem cell mobilization, potentially delaying hematopoietic recovery, a process referred to as hematopoietic remodeling. In this paper, we will retrospectively analyze and summarise the research progress related to the effects of previous chemotherapeutic agents on hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and hematopoietic remodeling, to further improve the prognosis and quality of survival of MM patients who are eligible for transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.