ArticleHealthcare technology letters
The Feasibility of Ambulatory Heart Rate Variability Monitoring in Non-Suicidal Self-Injury.
Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The polyvagal theory proposes that the autonomic nervous system influences affective systems and top-down emotional regulation. Vagal tone, as indexed by heart rate variability (HRV), is a measure of emotion regulation capacity. It is possible that non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) occurs at times of low vagal tone and that NSSI may increase it. Little is known about the feasibility of collecting ambulatory HRV data in the context of NSSI. This prospective observational study examined the feasibility of ambulatory HRV monitoring during NSSI. Ten participants wore a chest-based heart rate monitor and used a diary app for 1 week. Baseline characteristics were collected. Heart rate monitoring duration, diary app entries, distress scores, and NSSI occurrences were recorded. Participant experience was assessed in a post-study questionnaire. At baseline, six had a history of NSSI, in two of whom it was current. Ten participants wore the monitor for an average of 137 h. Nine participants successfully used the diary app, making an average of 14 entries over a week. Although no NSSI occurred during the study, the overall experience of participation was positive. It is feasible to monitor HRV and collect app-based distress scores for a week, including in those with NSSI history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.