ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2025
Impact of payer rejections and out-of-pocket costs on patient access to bempedoic acid therapy.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bempedoic Acid: From Guidelines to the Real World.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2026Review
- AJPC 2025 in review: A year of growth & clearer mandate for actionable prevention.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Clinician-level variation in lipid management for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Opportunities for practice improvement.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Prescriber Uptake and Use of Novel Lipid-Lowering Therapies.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early uptake of novel cholesterol-lowering therapies was limited by extensive utilization management practices and high cost. Whether similar challenges affected access to bempedoic acid (BA) is unknown. Methods: For all patients prescribed BA from the date of FDA approval (February 2020) through 12/31/2022 identified using nationwide pharmacy transaction data, we assessed whether their first prescription was approved or rejected. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with approval. Among those approved, prescription fill rates were evaluated by out-of-pocket cost. For those with rejected prescriptions, changes in lipid-lowering therapy after rejection were described. Results: Of 116,176 patients (median age 67 years; 56.6 % women) initially prescribed BA, 80,056 (68.9 %) received approval. Factors associated with approval included: commercial insurance (odds ratio [OR] 1.62 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.56, 1.68] vs. government insurance, Conclusion: Nearly half of patients prescribed BA failed to receive therapy due to a combination of payer rejections and prescription abandonment. Arduous utilization management criteria or high OOP costs put patients at high risk for failure of therapy initiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.