Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027073›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical and biological engineering2024

Preliminary Results: Comparison of Convolutional Neural Network Architectures as an Auxiliary Clinical Tool Applied to Screening Mammography in Mexican Women.

Samara Acosta-Jiménez, Susana Aideé González-Chávez, Javier Camarillo-Cisneros, César Pacheco-Tena, Mirelle Barcenas-López, Laura Esther González-Lozada, Claudia Hernández-Orozco, Jesús Humberto Burboa-Delgado, Rosa Elena Ochoa-Albíztegui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical and biological engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Samara Acosta-JiménezLaboratorio PABIOM, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, México.
Susana Aideé González-ChávezLaboratorio PABIOM, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, México.
Javier Camarillo-CisnerosLaboratorio de Física Química Computacional, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, México.
César Pacheco-TenaLaboratorio PABIOM, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, México.
Mirelle Barcenas-LópezGrupo de Radiología del Sureste, Clínica Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Laura Esther González-LozadaHospital Ángeles Puebla, Puebla, México.
Claudia Hernández-OrozcoHospital General de Pachuca, Pachuca de Soto, Hidalgo, México.
Jesús Humberto Burboa-DelgadoCentro de Diagnóstico por Imágenes Burboa-Radiólogos, Ensenada, Baja California, México.
Rosa Elena Ochoa-AlbízteguiDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5443-6702

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Mammography is the modality of choice for the early detection of breast cancer. Deep learning, using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) specifically, have achieved extraordinary results in the classification of diseases, including breast cancer, on imaging. The images used to train a CNN varies based on several factors, such as imaging technique, imaging equipment, and study population; these factors significantly affect the accuracy of the CNN models. The aim of this study was to develop a novel CNN for the classification of mammograms as benign or malignant and to compare its utility to that of popular pre-trained CNNs in the literature using transfer learning. All CNNs were trained to detect breast cancer on mammograms using mammograms from a created database of Mexican women (MAMMOMX-PABIOM) and from a public database of UK women (MIAS). Methods: A database (MAMMOMX-PABIOM) was built comprising 1,070 mammography images of 235 Mexican patients from 4 hospitals in Mexico. The study also used mammographic images from the Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) public database, which comprises mammography images from the UK National Breast Screening Programme. A novel CNN was developed and trained based on different configurations of training data; the accuracy of the models resulting from the novel CNN were compared with models resulting from more advanced pre-trained CNNs (DenseNet121, MobileNetV2, ResNet 50, VGG16) which were built using transfer learning. Results: Of the models resulting from pre-trained CNNs using transfer learning, the model based on MobileNetV2 and training data from the MAMMOMX-PABIOM database achieved the highest validation accuracy of 70.10%. In comparison, the novel CNN, when trained with the data configuration A6, which comprises data from both the MAMMOMX-PABIOM database and the MIAS database, produced a much higher accuracy of 99.14%. Conclusion: Although transfer learning is a widely used technique when training, data is scarce. The novel CNN produced much higher accuracy values across all configurations of training data compared to the accuracy values of pre-trained CNNs using transfer learning. In addition, this study addresses the gap in that neither a national database of mammograms of Mexican women exists, nor a deep learning tool for the classification of mammograms as benign or malignant that is focused on this population.

Indexed as

ClassificationConvolutional neural networksMammographyTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID40027073
PMCPMC11870662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.