ArticleJournal of medical and biological engineering2024
Preliminary Results: Comparison of Convolutional Neural Network Architectures as an Auxiliary Clinical Tool Applied to Screening Mammography in Mexican Women.
Article in Journal of medical and biological engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Mammography is the modality of choice for the early detection of breast cancer. Deep learning, using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) specifically, have achieved extraordinary results in the classification of diseases, including breast cancer, on imaging. The images used to train a CNN varies based on several factors, such as imaging technique, imaging equipment, and study population; these factors significantly affect the accuracy of the CNN models. The aim of this study was to develop a novel CNN for the classification of mammograms as benign or malignant and to compare its utility to that of popular pre-trained CNNs in the literature using transfer learning. All CNNs were trained to detect breast cancer on mammograms using mammograms from a created database of Mexican women (MAMMOMX-PABIOM) and from a public database of UK women (MIAS). Methods: A database (MAMMOMX-PABIOM) was built comprising 1,070 mammography images of 235 Mexican patients from 4 hospitals in Mexico. The study also used mammographic images from the Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) public database, which comprises mammography images from the UK National Breast Screening Programme. A novel CNN was developed and trained based on different configurations of training data; the accuracy of the models resulting from the novel CNN were compared with models resulting from more advanced pre-trained CNNs (DenseNet121, MobileNetV2, ResNet 50, VGG16) which were built using transfer learning. Results: Of the models resulting from pre-trained CNNs using transfer learning, the model based on MobileNetV2 and training data from the MAMMOMX-PABIOM database achieved the highest validation accuracy of 70.10%. In comparison, the novel CNN, when trained with the data configuration A6, which comprises data from both the MAMMOMX-PABIOM database and the MIAS database, produced a much higher accuracy of 99.14%. Conclusion: Although transfer learning is a widely used technique when training, data is scarce. The novel CNN produced much higher accuracy values across all configurations of training data compared to the accuracy values of pre-trained CNNs using transfer learning. In addition, this study addresses the gap in that neither a national database of mammograms of Mexican women exists, nor a deep learning tool for the classification of mammograms as benign or malignant that is focused on this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.