ArticleCureus2025
Prescription Pattern of Laxatives for Opioid-Induced Constipation in Japanese Patients With Chronic Non-cancer Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study of a Health Insurance Claims Database.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opioid-induced constipation in internal medicine: recognition and management pathways.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Review
- Incidence of opioid-induced constipation in non-cancer patients using weak opioids for chronic pain in Japan: a cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most common side effect of opioids. Weak opioids are often prescribed for non-cancer chronic pain in Japan; however, data on laxative use are scarce. We evaluated the real-world prescription patterns of laxatives for OIC in patients administered weak opioids for non-cancer pain in Japan. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we extracted data from a Japanese health insurance claims database for patients with chronic non-cancer pain (lower back pain, joint pain, and neuropathic pain) who were continuously prescribed weak opioids for ≥1 month after initiating weak opioids between 2017 and 2022. Results Of 425,556 patients prescribed weak opioids, 42,514 patients (mean age: 50.1 years) were included. Most were prescribed ≤150 mg tramadol equivalent/day, and 21,405 (50.3%) were on weak opioids for lower back pain. The proportion of laxatives prescribed on the first day of weak opioid prescription was 6.7%; the cumulative prescription rate during the 12‑week follow-up was 13.6%. The most common laxatives during the first week were magnesium oxide (2,320 (66.6%)), sennoside (484 (13.9%)), and naldemedine (301 (8.6%)); at 12 weeks, these proportions were 55.2%, 13.1%, and 13.8%, respectively. The amount of weak opioids prescribed to patients without laxatives was lower than the standard dosage and was also lower than the amount prescribed to patients with laxatives. Conclusions This study showed that the actual prescription patterns of laxatives after initiating weak opioids in patients with chronic non-cancer pain were variable, depending on the duration after initiating weak opioids. The association between laxative use and weak opioid dosage indicates that OIC management may have a potential impact on pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.