ArticleCureus2025
Trends in Underrepresented Race and Ethnicity Among Internal Medicine-Pediatrics Residents and Related Specialties: 2005-2020.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Increased diversity of race and ethnicity in internal medicine-pediatrics (med-peds) and related specialties may improve health disparities in the United States (US). Family medicine (FM), internal medicine (IM), and pediatric residencies have demonstrated variable and inconsistent trends in the representation of underrepresented minorities in medicine (URiM), but information about URiM med-peds trainees is limited. The primary aim was to compare trends in URiM representation from 2005 to 2020 among US med-peds residents to FM, IM, and pediatrics. The secondary aim was to compare these trends to the US population. Methods Self-reported race and ethnicity data was obtained from annual graduate medical education census reports and the US Census Bureau. A cross-sectional analysis of African American/Black (AA), American Indian/Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and Hispanic representation among the US population and med-peds, FM, IM, and pediatric residents was performed. Trends in proportions of URiM representation among residents and the US population were evaluated using the Cochran-Armitage test. Results There was a significant positive trend in the proportion of total URiM residents in med-peds (11.0% (n = 156) to 15.1% (n = 226), p = 0.01), FM (16.5% (n = 1,550) to 18.7% (n = 2,565), p = 0.04), IM (12.3% (n = 2,688) to 15.5% (n = 4,455), p < 0.001), and pediatrics (14.9% (n = 1,187) to 18.4% (n = 1,670), p < 0.001). Total URiM med-peds representation remained below other specialties throughout the study. Med-peds residencies demonstrated a significant positive trend in Hispanic representation (3.3% (n = 47) to 7.7% (n = 116), p < 0.001) and a significant negative trend in AA representation (6.9% (n = 98) to 7.1% (n = 107), p = 0.01). Total URiM representation remained below the US population for all specialties throughout the study. Conclusion The total proportion of URiM med-peds, FM, IM, and pediatric residents improved. For med-peds, this improvement was largely due to increased Hispanic resident representation. However, URiM med-peds resident representation is consistently below related specialties. URiM resident representation in med-peds and related specialties poorly reflects the diversity of the US population and should be urgently addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.