ArticleCureus2025
Lateral Condyle Fracture of the Humerus in the Pediatric Age Group: A 10-Year Tertiary Center Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Lateral humeral condyle fracture is a relatively common elbow injury among children, which often has a subtle presentation and a high risk of developing complications. This study aimed to discuss the epidemiology of such injury among children presenting to a tertiary hospital emergency room in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Other objectives included analyzing possible predictors and risk factors for developing complications in such patients, which will contribute to implementing preventive measures. Methodology This was a single-center, retrospective study conducted on data collected from patients presenting to the pediatric emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from January 1, 2014, to July 2024. Patients under 18 years of age, with a minimum of six months of follow-up and complete data in our medical records, were included. A total of 77 patients were identified by convenience sampling; seven were excluded due to incomplete data or a follow-up period of less than six months. Where appropriate, statistical significance between variables was assessed using Fisher's exact test and Pearson's chi-square test. A
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.