ReviewCureus2025
Advancements in Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in the Radiological Detection of Pulmonary Embolism.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning models for pulmonary embolism segmentation on dual-energy CT: performance analysis and image quality correlation.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Unexpected early pulmonary thrombi in war injured patients.European radiology · 2026Article
- Developing a novel deep learning-based model for automatic right ventricular parameters assessment on ctpa in pulmonary embolism.Emergency radiology · 2025Article
- Improvement of artificial intelligence-based computed tomography pulmonary angiography in identifying acute pulmonary embolism.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2025Review
- The Role and Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Function Tests: A Systematic Review.Current health sciences journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a clinically challenging diagnosis that varies from silent to life-threatening symptoms. Timely diagnosis of the condition is subject to clinical assessment, D-dimer testing and radiological imaging. Computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) is considered the gold standard imaging modality, although some cases can be missed due to reader dependency, resulting in adverse patient outcomes. Hence, it is crucial to implement faster and precise diagnostic strategies to help clinicians diagnose and treat PE patients promptly and mitigate morbidity and mortality. Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) are the newly emerging tools in the medical field, including in radiological imaging, potentially improving diagnostic efficacy. Our review of the studies showed that computer-aided design (CAD) and AI tools displayed similar to superior sensitivity and specificity in identifying PE on CTPA as compared to radiologists. Several tools demonstrated the potential in identifying minor PE on radiological scans showing promising ability to aid clinicians in reducing missed cases substantially. However, it is imperative to design sophisticated tools and conduct large clinical trials to integrate AI use in everyday clinical setting and establish guidelines for its ethical applicability. ML and AI can also potentially help physicians in formulating individualized management strategies to enhance patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.