Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40026973›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Pulpectomy in a Primary Second Molar With a Questionable Prognosis and Extruded Obturation Material.

Zain Hafiz, Amani Alanazi, Shoag M Hummady, Reem Alfaran

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zain HafizDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Amani AlanaziDepartment of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Shoag M HummadyDepartment of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Reem AlfaranDepartment of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A pulpectomy is a common treatment to preserve the function of primary teeth with irreversible pulpitis or necrosis and prevent consequences like the mesial drifting of a permanent molar. This report discusses a seven-year-old female with a necrotic mandibular primary second molar (#75) that has a questionable prognosis. Vitapex was used as obturation material during the procedure, and X-rays showed extruded material from the D canal. After nine months, the patient showed no signs or symptoms, and the extruded material had completely resorbed. This case highlights Vitapex's safety and effectiveness in primary tooth pulpectomy, even with uncertain outcomes. It also shows the importance of saving primary teeth, proper technique, material selection, and regular follow-up for successful treatment. A pulpectomy is a root canal procedure for pulp tissue that is irreversibly inflamed or necrotic due to caries or trauma. The main goals of pulp therapy in the primary dentition are to keep the tooth in a pathologically healthy condition by removing infected pulp tissue, preserve its function as a space maintainer in the primary dentition, and remove infection and chronic inflammation while providing relief from the pain caused by inflamed pulpal tissue. Thus, the tooth retains its functional status until natural exfoliation.

Indexed as

dentistrypedodonticprimary teethpulpectomyvitapex

Identifiers

PMID40026973
PMCPMC11867779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.