ArticleCureus2025
When Time Matters: Diagnosis of Percheron Stroke.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The artery of Percheron (AOP) is a rare vascular variant that can cause bilateral paramedian thalamic infarctions when occluded. Due to its atypical clinical presentation and subtle imaging findings, this condition often leads to significant diagnostic challenges. The timely recognition of this condition is critical to implementing appropriate management strategies and improving patient outcomes. We report the case of a 76-year-old man with no prior medical history who presented to the emergency department with a sudden onset of impaired consciousness and vertical gaze palsy. On arrival, the patient was in a state of sleep-like coma. This clinical presentation, combined with the sudden onset of symptoms, was highly suggestive of an AOP infarction. The initial CT findings were unremarkable. Intravenous thrombolysis was administered due to clinical suspicion. The patient demonstrated rapid clinical improvement and regained consciousness in several hours. A follow-up CT scan 24 hours later confirmed bilateral paramedian thalamic infarction, establishing the diagnosis. Although the patient experienced moderate residual cognitive impairment and mild vertical gaze paresis, he regained functional independence within six months. AOP infarction is a rare but serious condition that can present with various symptoms. Its diagnosis can be challenging due to the nonspecific clinical presentation and limitations of conventional imaging techniques in the acute phase, especially in our local context. Early diagnosis and timely intervention, such as intravenous thrombolysis, are crucial to improving functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.