ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2025
AI-assisted diagnostic approach for the influenza-like illness in children: decision support system for patients and clinicians.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Influenza-like illnesses (ILI), such as influenza and RSV, pose significant global health burdens, especially in febrile children under 6 years old. Differentiating these from bacterial infections based solely on clinical symptoms is challenging. While PCR tests are reliable, they are costly and time-consuming. An effective predictive tool would help doctors prioritize tests and guide parents on seeking emergency care for their febrile children. We collected data from 2,559 children who visited the hospital for ILI inspections. We developed XGBoost models, comparing nine different machine learning algorithms. Our AI-assisted diagnostic pipeline consists of two stages: Decision Support System for patients (DSS-P): An in-house model using sex, age, symptoms, and medical history to decide on hospital visits. Decision Support System for clinicians (DSS-C): An in-hospital model incorporating breath sound types and Chest X-ray results to determine the necessity of clinical tests. We tested various experimental settings, including the addition of RAT-tested samples and the combined consideration of influenza and RSV. The performance for influenza achieved an Area Under the Curve of 0.749 and 0.776, while RSV achieved 0.907 and 0.924 in DSS-P and DSS-C, respectively. We identified biomarkers, noting that most biomarkers had opposite effects for influenza and RSV. This study developed predictive models for influenza and RSV and explored their underlying mechanisms. An expectation tool to guide doctors in prioritizing tests or assisting parents in deciding on emergency care for their febrile child would be invaluable. Biomarker analysis performed can provide insight on clinical fields. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-024-00450-8.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.