ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Preliminary testing for affiliate stigma scale: A reliable and valid stigma measure for caregivers of women with breast cancer.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of interventions targeting social constraints among adults with cancer and their caregivers: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the revised social constraints scale for partners of adults with cancer.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Families of breast cancer patients may face discrimination and societal rejection due to prevailing myths, misconceptions and causal beliefs related to breast cancer. This study aims to develop and validate a measurement tool that is sensitive to the affiliate stigma experienced by caregivers of women with breast cancer. Methods: The scale was developed in two phases: (1) item generation based on interviews amongst 18 caregivers of women with breast cancer; (2) psychometric properties of the scale, including content validity, structural validity, and internal consistency reliability. Data were collected from May to June 2023 in 426 caregivers of women with breast cancer from 5 tertiary A hospitals. Results: An exploratory factor analysis produced a 24-item scale across four dimensions, including internal stigma, social isolation, perceived stigma, and reaction. The scale showed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The total score of the scale was significantly and positively correlated with scores in caregiving burden and negatively correlated with scores in self-esteem and in social support. The item-level content validity index fell within the range of 0.8-1.0. Conclusions: This is a valid and reliable instrument captured the spectrum of stigma relevant to caregivers of women with breast cancer and may serve as a unique instrument that can be used globally. This study is a step forward for stigma-related studies among caregivers of women with breast cancer and provides a reference for developing effective interventions for those with potentially stigmatized conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.