Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40026843›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Equitable hospital length of stay prediction for patients with learning disabilities and multiple long-term conditions using machine learning.

Emeka Abakasanga, Rania Kousovista, Georgina Cosma, Ashley Akbari, Francesco Zaccardi, Navjot Kaur, Danielle Fitt, Gyuchan Thomas Jun, Reza Kiani, Satheesh Gangadharan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emeka AbakasangaComputer Science Department, School of Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Rania KousovistaComputer Science Department, School of Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Georgina CosmaComputer Science Department, School of Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Ashley AkbariFaculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Francesco ZaccardiLeicester Real World Evidence Unit, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Navjot KaurLeicester Real World Evidence Unit, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Danielle FittFaculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Gyuchan Thomas JunSchool of Design and Creative Arts, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Reza KianiLearning Disability Service (Agnes Unit), Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Satheesh GangadharanLearning Disability Service (Agnes Unit), Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Individuals with learning disabilities (LD) often face higher rates of premature mortality and prolonged hospital stays compared to the general population. Predicting the length of stay (LOS) for patients with LD and multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) is critical for improving patient care and optimising medical resource allocation. However, there is limited research on the application of machine learning (ML) models to this population. Furthermore, approaches designed for the general population often lack generalisability and fairness, particularly when applied across sensitive groups within their cohort. Method: This study analyses hospitalisations of 9,618 patients with LD in Wales using electronic health records (EHR) from the SAIL Databank. A Random Forest (RF) ML model was developed to predict hospital LOS, incorporating demographics, medication history, lifestyle factors, and 39 long-term conditions. To address fairness concerns, two bias mitigation techniques were applied: a post-processing threshold optimiser and an in-processing reductions method using an exponentiated gradient. These methods aimed to minimise performance discrepancies across ethnic groups while ensuring robust model performance. Results: The RF model outperformed other state-of-the-art models, achieving an area under the curve of 0.759 for males and 0.756 for females, a false negative rate of 0.224 for males and 0.229 for females, and a balanced accuracy of 0.690 for males and 0.689 for females. Bias mitigation algorithms reduced disparities in prediction performance across ethnic groups, with the threshold optimiser yielding the most notable improvements. Performance metrics, including false positive rate and balanced accuracy, showed significant enhancements in fairness for the male cohort. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying ML models to predict LOS for patients with LD and MLTCs, while addressing fairness through bias mitigation techniques. The findings highlight the potential for equitable healthcare predictions using EHR data, paving the way for improved clinical decision-making and resource management.

Indexed as

bias mitigationexponentiated gradientlearning disabilitieslength of staythreshold optimiser

Identifiers

PMID40026843
PMCPMC11868268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.