ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Equitable hospital length of stay prediction for patients with learning disabilities and multiple long-term conditions using machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effectiveness of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Healthcare Service Quality Metrics: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The promise and peril of AI for disability health equity: A justice-centered narrative review.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
- Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Models for ICU Length of Stay Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Adversarial debiasing for age-equitable diabetes prediction: performance-fairness trade-offs and partition dependency in machine learning.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial neural network-driven approaches to improved forecasting of disability care expenditures in an aging Kingdom of Saudi Arabia population.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Individuals with learning disabilities (LD) often face higher rates of premature mortality and prolonged hospital stays compared to the general population. Predicting the length of stay (LOS) for patients with LD and multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) is critical for improving patient care and optimising medical resource allocation. However, there is limited research on the application of machine learning (ML) models to this population. Furthermore, approaches designed for the general population often lack generalisability and fairness, particularly when applied across sensitive groups within their cohort. Method: This study analyses hospitalisations of 9,618 patients with LD in Wales using electronic health records (EHR) from the SAIL Databank. A Random Forest (RF) ML model was developed to predict hospital LOS, incorporating demographics, medication history, lifestyle factors, and 39 long-term conditions. To address fairness concerns, two bias mitigation techniques were applied: a post-processing threshold optimiser and an in-processing reductions method using an exponentiated gradient. These methods aimed to minimise performance discrepancies across ethnic groups while ensuring robust model performance. Results: The RF model outperformed other state-of-the-art models, achieving an area under the curve of 0.759 for males and 0.756 for females, a false negative rate of 0.224 for males and 0.229 for females, and a balanced accuracy of 0.690 for males and 0.689 for females. Bias mitigation algorithms reduced disparities in prediction performance across ethnic groups, with the threshold optimiser yielding the most notable improvements. Performance metrics, including false positive rate and balanced accuracy, showed significant enhancements in fairness for the male cohort. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying ML models to predict LOS for patients with LD and MLTCs, while addressing fairness through bias mitigation techniques. The findings highlight the potential for equitable healthcare predictions using EHR data, paving the way for improved clinical decision-making and resource management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.