ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Machine Learning-Based Objective Evaluation Model of CTPA Image Quality: A Multi-Center Study.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to develop a machine learning-based model for the objective assessment of CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) image quality. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from 99 patients who underwent CTPA between March 2022 and January 2023, alongside two public datasets, FUMPE (21 cases) and CAD-PE (30 cases). In total, 150 cases from multiple centers were included in this analysis. The dataset was randomly split into a training set (105 cases) and a testing set (45 cases) in a 7:3 ratio. CT values and their standard deviations (SD) were measured in 11 specific regions of interest, and two radiologists independently assigned anonymous random scores to the images. The average of their subjective scores was used as the target output for the model, which was the mean opinion score (MOS) for image quality. Feature selection was performed using the Lasso algorithm and Pearson correlation coefficient, and a random forest regression model was constructed. Model performance was evaluated using mean square error (MSE), coefficient of determination (R²), Pearson linear correlation coefficient (PLCC), Spearman rank correlation coefficient (SRCC), and Kendall rank correlation coefficient (KRCC). Results: After feature selection, three key features were retained: main pulmonary artery CT value, ascending aorta CT value, and the difference in noise values between the left and right main pulmonary arteries. The random forest regression model constructed achieved MSE, R2_score, PLCC, SRCC, and KRCC values of 0.2001, 0.6695, 0.8682, 0.8694, 0.7363, respectively, on the testing set. Conclusion: This study successfully developed an interpretable machine learning-based model for the objective assessment of CTPA image quality. The model offers effective support for improving image quality control efficiency and precision. However, the limited sample size may affect the model's generalizability, so it's essential to conduct further research with larger datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.