ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Development and Validation of a Non-Invasive Prediction Model for Glioma-Associated Epilepsy: A Comparative Analysis of Nomogram and Decision Tree.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based models for predicting glioma-associated epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Glioma-associated epilepsy (GAE) is a common neurological symptom in glioma patients, which can worsen the condition and increase the risk of death on the basis of primary injury. Given this, accurate prediction of GAE is crucial, and this study aims to develop and validate a GAE warning recognition prediction model. Methods: We retrospectively collected MRI scan imaging data and urine samples from 566 glioma patients at the Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science from August 2016 to December 2023. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate logistic regression analysis are used to determine independent risk factors for GAE. The nomogram and decision tree GAE visualization prediction model were constructed based on independent risk factors. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness of GAE prediction models were evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA), respectively. Results: In the training and validation datasets, the incidence of GAE was 34.50% and 33.00%, respectively. Nomogram and decision tree were composed of five independent radiomic predictors and three differential protein molecules derived from urine. The discrimination rate of area under the curve (AUC) was 0.897 (95% CI: 0.840-0.954), slightly decreased in the validation data set, reaching 0.874 (95% CI: 8.817-0.931). The calibration curve showed a high degree of consistency between the predicted GAE probability and the actual probability. In addition, DCA analysis showed that in machine learning prediction models, decision trees have higher overall net returns within the threshold probability range. Conclusion: We have introduced a machine learning prediction model for GAE detection in glioma patients based on multiomics data. This model can improve the prognosis of GAE by providing early warnings and actionable feedback and prevent or reduce pathological damage and neurobiochemical changes by implementing early interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.