ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Lateral walking gait phase recognition for hip exoskeleton by denoising autoencoder-LSTM.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A fusion transfer learning framework for intelligent pest recognition in sustainable agriculture.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lateral resistance walk is an effective way to strengthen the abductor muscles of the hip. Accurate lateral walking gait recognition is the prerequisite for exoskeletons to be applied to lateral walking exercises. This paper proposes a denoising autoencoder-LSTM (DAE-LSTM) algorithm for lateral walking gait recognition. Nine sets of IMU data at three speeds and three strides of ten subjects were collected. Four lateral walking gait phases of narrow double support (NDS), guided foot swing (GFS), wide double support (WDS) and following leg swing (FLS) were recognized. The recognition performance of random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), neural networks (NN) and DAE-LSTM were compared. The average cross-subject recognition accuracy of DAE-LSTM was 90.2 %, which was higher than the other four models and previous work. For each frame of IMU data, the average recognition time of DAE-LSTM is 0.383 ms, which is 5.32 ms higher than the previous work. When the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is greater than 100:1, the accuracy of the DAE-LSTM model is higher than 90.0 %, and the accuracy of the other four models were less than 85 %. The results show that the proposed algorithm can achieve the requirements of recognition accuracy, model recognition time and model robustness for application in exoskeleton.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.